The global impact of china's international strategy in the food sector
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21527/2237-6453.2025.62.16514Keywords:
China, BRI, food regime, food securityAbstract
Amid the current international disorder, China's new Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has garnered attention as a global strategy reflecting its growing political and economic power. This essay adopts a "food regime" approach to analyze these developments. It explores two related dimensions: the first focuses on how China is addressing future food security needs, both domestically and internationally; and the second situates China's recent "going out" policy in the context of global food regime transitioning.
References
ACHARYA, Amitav. The End of American World Order. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2017.
ARRIGHI, G. The long twentieth century: money, power, and the origins of our times. New York: Verso, 2007.
BELESKY, Paul; LAWRENCE, Geoffrey. China's place in the global food system: A rising power in the global South. Journal of Rural Studies, v. 61, p. 13–27, 2018.
BLOOMBERG. Agriculture's role in the new economy. [S.l.]: Bloomberg, 2018b.
BORRAS, S. M. et al. The challenge of land grabbing and its implications for social movements. Journal of Agrarian Change, v. 18, n. 2, p. 305-324, 2018.
BORRAS, Saturnino M. et al. Land grabbing in Latin America and the Caribbean viewed from broader international perspectives. Globalizations, v. 9, n. 1, p. 17-34, 2012.
BRANFORD, Sue. China’s Soybean Succession. Latin America Bureau. 2018. Disponível em: https://lab.org.uk/chinas-soybean-succession. Acesso em: 25 jun. 2024.
CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES (CSIS). Land-based investments in Africa: a look at the data. Washington, DC, 2017.
CLAPP, Jennifer. Food Security and International Trade. In: CLAPP, Jennifer; FUCHS, Doris. Corporate power in global agrifood governance. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2016. p. 119-136.
COFCO INTERNATIONAL. COFCO International strengthens Brazilian soybean exports. 2019. Disponível em: https://www.cofcointernational.com. Acesso em: 25 jun. 2024.
CUI, J.; SHOEMAKER, C. The role of state-owned enterprises in China's land acquisition. Land Use Policy, v. 73, p. 207-216, 2018.
ETC GROUP. Plate tech-tonics: mapping corporate power in big food. Winnipeg: ETC Group, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.etcgroup.org/content/plate-tech-tonics. Acesso em: 19 set. 2023.
FRIEDMANN, Harriet. Changes in the International Division of Labour: Agri-Food Complexes and Export Agriculture. The International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, v. 1, n. 1, p. 12-38, 1991.
FRIEDMANN, Harriet; McMICHAEL, Philip. Agriculture and the state system: The rise and decline of national agricultures, 1870 to the present. Sociologia Ruralis, v. 29, n. 2, p. 93–117, 1989.
GRAIN. Foreign investment in agriculture in Eastern Europe and Central Asia: a threat or opportunity? Barcelona: GRAIN, 2015. Disponível em: https://www.grain.org. Acesso em: 19 set. 2024.
GRAIN. Seized: the 2008 land grab for food and financial security. [S.l.]: GRAIN, 2015.
GRIMSDITCH, Mark. COFCO: China’s agricultural go-global strategy. Inclusive Development International, 2017.
GUTTAL, Shalmali. Structural Adjustment and the GATT/WTO: Agriculture and Rural Livelihoods in Southeast Asia. In: MCMICHAEL, Philip (ed.). Development and Social Change: A Global Perspective. 6th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2018. p. 103-130.
HALPERIN, Sandra. Re-Envisioning Global Development: A Horizontal Perspective. Routledge, 2013.
HOPEWELL, Kristen. Breaking the WTO: How Emerging Powers Disrupted the Neoliberal Project. Global Trade, v. 11, n. 2, p. 180-203, 2016.
IAASTD. International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD): Global Report. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2008. Disponível em: https://www.globalagriculture.org/report-topics/about-iaastd.html. Acesso em: 5 nov. 2023.
LA VIA CAMPESINA. Declaración de la soberanía alimentaria. Cúpula Mundial de la Alimentación, Roma, 1996. Disponível em: https://viacampesina.org/en/declaration-of-food-sovereignty/. Acesso em: 9 Jan. 2022.
LEGUÍZAMON, Amalia. Displacement and deforestation: Argentine Soybean. Journal of Agrarian Change, v. 16, n. 3, p. 572–580, 2016.
LI, X. et al. Global land grabbing: is it the new scramble for Africa? Journal of Peasant Studies, v. 40, n. 3, p. 426-454, 2013.
McMICHAEL, Philip. Food Regimes and Agrarian Questions. Fernwood Publishing, 2013a.
McMICHAEL, Philip. Historicizing food regimes. The Journal of Peasant Studies, v. 36, n. 1, p. 139–169, 2009.
McMICHAEL, Philip. The land grab and corporate food regime restructuring. Journal of Peasant Studies, v. 40, n. 3, p. 682–701, 2013b.
NESBIT, Jeff. Can a giant canal across South America save the rainforest?. Time, 2018. Disponível em: https://time.com/canal-amazon-rainforest/. Acesso em: 25 jun. 2024.
OLIVEIRA, Gustavo de L. T.; HECHT, Susanna. Soy, Globalization, and Environmental Politics in South America. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Environmental Science, 2016. Disponível em: https://oxfordre.com. Acesso em: 25 jun. 2024.
ONG, Aihwa. Neoliberalism as Exception: Mutations in Citizenship and Sovereignty. Durham: Duke University Press, 2006.
ORGANIZAÇÃO DAS NAÇÕES UNIDAS (ONU). Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2005. Disponível em: https://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/index.html. Acesso em: 10 Mar. 2023.
PEINE, Emelie K. The globalization of farmland: New landholders and the “rule of the market”. Sociologia Ruralis, v. 50, n. 3, p. 276–294, 2010.
PIETERSE, J. N. The meaning of development: perspectives on the global South. Third World Quarterly, v. 39, n. 5, p. 909-926, 2018.
PRITCHARD, Bill; SINGH, Shantanu; YEUNG, Henry. Feeding India: The Spatial Politics of Food Safety and Sovereignty in the New Global Context. Geographical Research, v. 54, n. 1, p. 80-94, 2016.
ROSENBERG, Justin. The Follies of Globalisation Theory. London: Verso, 2001.
SALA, S. The politics of food security and land grabbing in the global south. Food Policy, v. 84, p. 101-109, 2019.
SCHNEIDER, M. Land grabbing and food sovereignty: the case of Brazil. Land, v. 6, n. 4, p. 107, 2017.
SCHNEIDER, M. The politics of land grabbing in the context of global capitalism. Geoforum, v. 54, p. 1-11, 2014.
SCHNEIDER, Mindi. We are hungry! A summary report of food riots, government responses, and states of democracy in 2008. Development, v. 57, p. 58-66, 2014.
SCOONES, I. et al. The politics of land governance in Africa: a political economy perspective. World Development, v. 86, p. 111-122, 2016.
STREECK, Wolfgang. How will capitalism end? Verso, 2016.
VAN DER PLOEG, J.; YE, J. Agricultural production and social dynamics: how to balance environmental protection and economic growth. Journal of Rural Studies, v. 46, p. 168-178, 2016a.
WEIS, Tony. The global food economy: The battle for the future of farming. Zed Books, 2010.
WILLETT, W. et al. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. The Lancet, v. 393, n. 10170, p. 447-492, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.thelancet.com/commissions/EAT. Acesso em: 19 Dec. 2023.
WINDERS, Bill. The Political Economy of Agricultural Policy in the United States. New York: Routledge, 2017.
WINDERS, J. The rise of agrarian capitalism in Latin America: the case of Brazil. Latin American Politics and Society, v. 51, n. 1, p. 1-26, 2009.
YAN, H.; CHEN, J.; KU, S. China’s land governance and its implications for food security. Land Use Policy, v. 57, p. 419-429, 2016.
YAN, Hairong; CHEN, Yiyuan; KU, Tianyang. Chinese Agribusiness Investment in South America: The Case of Soybean. Journal of Agrarian Change, v. 16, n. 3, p. 381–400, 2016.
YUNAN, X. Rural land reform and social dynamics in China. China Agricultural Economic Review, v. 10, n. 3, p. 456-470, 2018.
ZHANG, Fang. Chinese food security and its global impact. Journal of Rural Studies, v. 67, p. 41–53, 2019.
ZHANG, W. Global land grabbing and its implications for the agrarian question. Agricultural and Human Values, v. 36, p. 217-229, 2019.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Argemiro Luís Brum, Gustavo Alejandro Cardozo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By publishing in Revista Desenvolvimento em Questão, authors agree to the following terms:
All works are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows:
Sharing — to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format;
Adaptation — to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
These permissions are irrevocable, provided that the following terms are respected:
Attribution — authors must be properly credited, a link to the license must be provided, and any changes made must be indicated.
No additional restrictions — no legal or technological measures may be applied that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
The license does not apply to elements that are in the public domain or covered by legal exceptions.
The license does not grant all necessary rights for specific uses (e.g., image rights, privacy, or moral rights).
The journal is not responsible for the opinions expressed in the articles, which are the sole responsibility of the authors. The Editor, with the support of the Editorial Board, reserves the right to suggest or request modifications when necessary.
Only original scientific articles presenting research results of interest that have not been previously published or simultaneously submitted to another journal with the same purpose will be accepted.
Mentions of trademarks or specific products are intended solely for identification purposes and do not imply any promotional relationship by the authors or the journal.
License Agreement (for articles published from 2025 onward): Authors retain the copyright to their article and grant Revista Desenvolvimento em Questão the right of first publication.
