Dignity as a quasi-evaluative concept: A response to the naturalistic fallacy by John Finnis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21527/2317-5389.2023.21.12512Keywords:
dignity, normativeness, metaphysicAbstract
The article intend to make a critique the function of the concept of dignity within the theory by John Finnis, rigorously examining its pressupposition and normative limits. It comes to the conclusion that a dignity cannot be called really normative in the theory of the natural law of Finnis, but that, following an approximation of Waldron's terminology, it has an quasi-evaluative function, which consists in being a founding element of the requirements reasonableness and other grounds, limiting the normativity of ethical and legal commands, without being directly normative. For this, the Article’s first part presents two moments of the Finnis’s theory about dignity, the first less metaphysical and the second declaredly dependent on metaphysical assumptions. In the second part, it presents the critical positions of Finnis’s theory, which are relevant to the debate on dignity. Finally, it exposes the central thesis, that dignity is not directly normative, but only quasi-evaluative.
References
AQUINO, Tomás de. Comentário à Ética a Nicômaco de Aristóteles (I-III): o bem e as virtudes. Edição, tradução e notas Paulo Faitanin e Bernardo Veiga. Rio de Janeiro: Mutuus, 2015. Volume 1.
BARZOTTO, L. Filosofia do direito: os conceitos fundamentais e a tradição jusnaturalista. Porto Alegre: Livraria do Advogado, 2010.
CORREAS, Carlos Massini. Derechos Humanos y Bienes Humanos. In: Teoría del Derecho y Derechos Humanos. Peru: ARA Editores, 2011. p. 25-55.
ENGELMANN, Wilson. Direito natural ética e hermenêutica. Porto Alegre: Livraria do Advogado, 2007.
FERREIRA NETO, Arthur Maria. Metaética e fundamentação do Direito. Porto Alegre: Elegantia Juris, 2015.
FINNIS, John. Aquinas: Moral, Political and Legal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
FINNIS, John. The priority of persons. Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence, v. 4, 2000.
FINNIS, John. Direito natural em Tomás de Aquino: sua reinserção no contexto do juspositivismo analítico. Trad. Leandro Cordioli. Rev. Elton Somensi de Oliveira. Porto Alegre: Sergio Antonio Fabris Editor, 2007.
FINNIS, John. Natural law and natural rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2011a.
FINNIS, John. Human rights and their enforcement. In: Human rights and Common– Collected essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011b. p. 19-467. Vol. III.
FINNIS, John; GRISEZ, Germain; BOYLE, Joseph. Practical Principles, Moral Truth, and Ultimate Ends. American Journal of Jurisprudency, South Bend Ind, v. 32, p. 99-151, 1987.
GEORGE, Robert P. Conscience and Its Enemies: Confronting the dogmas of liberal secularism. Delaware: ISI Books, 2015.
HUME, David. Tratado da natureza humana: uma tentativa de introduzir o método experimental de raciocínio nos assuntos morais. Tradução Déborah Danowski. 2. ed. rev. e ampl. São Paulo: Editora Unesp, 2009.
IGLESIAS-ROZAS, Teresa. Reasons for Action. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, v. 8, n. 2, p. 238-246, 2000. DOI:10.1080/09672550050084036
KANT, Immanuel. Crítica da razão prática 1. ed. Trad. Monique Hulshof. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes; Bragança Paulista, SP: Editora Universitária São Francisco, 2016. (Coleção Pensamento Humano).
KANT, Immanuel. Fundamentação da metafísica dos costumes. Trad. Paulo Quintela. 1. ed. Lisboa: Edições 70, 2007. (Coleção Textos Filosóficos).
KANT, Immanuel. Introdução à doutrina do direito. In: A metafísica dos costumes. 1. ed. Trad. Edson Bini. São Paulo: Edipro, 2003, p. 1-89.
KANT, Immanuel. Of duties to oneself. In: Lectures on Ethics. (The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant). 1. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Trad. Peter Heath. 1997. p. 122-128.
KANT, Immanuel. Crítica da razão pura 1. ed. São Paulo: Abril. 1974. (Coleção Os Pensadores).
LISSKA, Anthony J. Aquinas theory of natural law: An analytic reconstruction. Oxford: Claredon Press, 1996.
MCINERNY, Ralph. The principles of natural law. Am. J. Juris., v. 25, 1980.
MCINERNY, Ralph. Natural Law and Human Rights. McInerny Center for Thomistic Studies, 1991. Disponível em: http://www.thomasinternational.org/ralphmc/readings/mcinerny000.htm
MICHELETTI, Mario. Tomismo analítico. São Paulo: Ideias e Letras, 2009.
MOORE, George Edward. Princípios de ética. São Paulo: Abril Cultural, 1974. (Coleção Os Pensadores).
OLIVEIRA, Elton Somensi de. Bem comum, razão prática e direito: a fundamentação do conceito de bem comum na obra de John M. Finnis. 2002. Dissertação (Mestrado) – Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito, Porto Alegre, 2002.
PETTERSEN, Bruno Batista. A naturalização da epistemologia: empirismo, ciência e semântica em Quine. São Paulo: Edições Loyola, 2014.
SÁEZ, C. P. La autoridad del derecho: un diálogo con John M. Finnis. Granada: Editorial Comares, 2008.
SCHWARTZ, D. Aquinas on Friendship. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
SENSEN, Oliver. Kant on human dignity (Kantstudien Erganzungshefte). Berlin; Boston: Hubert & Co. 2011.
SHORTALL, Michael. Human Rights and Moral Reasoning: A comparative investigation by way of three theorists and their respective traditions of enquiry: John Finnis, Ronald Dworkin and Jürgen Habermas. 2007. Tese (Doutorado) – St. Patrick's College Maynooth, 2007.
VEATCH, Henry Bancock. Rational Man: A modern interpretation of Aristotelian ethics. Blomongton & London: Indiana University Press, 1962.
VEATCH, Henry Bancock. Human rights: fact or fancy? Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1985.
WALDRON, J. Dignity and Rank. European Journal of Sociology, v. 48, n. 2, p. 201-237, 2007.
WESTERMAN, Pauline C. The Disintegration of Natural Law Theory. Aquinas to Finnis. 1998. Leiden; New York; Köln: Brill. 1998.
WOOD, Allen. Kantian Ethics. 1. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in Revista Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia agree to the following terms:
The works published in Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia follow the license for journals and research in all environments, whether commercial or non-commercial, that make up the international scientific communication system. The journal is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The editorial team authorizes free access and wide distribution of the published content, provided that the source is cited, i.e., credit is given to the authors and Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia, and the text is preserved in its entirety. Authors are allowed to deposit pre-print and post-print versions in institutional or thematic repositories or on their personal webpage (website, blog), as long as it is open access and without any embargo period.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows sharing the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are authorized to enter into separate additional contracts for non-exclusive distribution of the work published in this journal (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal webpage) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this may lead to productive changes, as well as increase the impact and citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
