Responsive regulation and the use of agricultural pesticides: An analysis from the farmer's perspectiv

Abstract

The current research investigates the reasons and justifications given by farmers for the continued use of chemical pesticides in farming, as opposed to a shift towards sustainable practices. The study employs a qualitative approach, in which we conducted interviews with groups of farmers from two geographically distinct municipalities: one characterized by conventional, chemical-heavy agriculture and the other by a growing adoption of sustainable methods. The analysis suggests a dominant influence of the industry on how farmers perceive chemicals pesticides as the most efficient cultivation method. This perception is likely shaped by the industry's promotional efforts and a relative dearth of information concerning alternative farming techniques. Consequently, farmers remain reliant on chemical products, hindering the widespread adoption of more sustainable alternatives. This study contributes to the ongoing debate surrounding chemical pesticide regulation by analyzing farmer perceptions and revealing a potential willingness to embrace sustainable practices, contingent upon the demonstration of their economic viability and practical benefits. In light of these findings, the research underscores the need for a more responsive regulatory framework that fosters closer collaboration with farmers. Additionally, the construction of an infrastructure for information dissemination, open dialogue, experience sharing, and technical support is crucial for those seeking to transition towards sustainable agricultural practices.