The formation of a virtual public sphere and its influence on the decision-making process with global repercussions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21527/2317-5389.2024.24.15951

Keywords:

Public sphere, Internet, Democratic participation, Transnationalization

Abstract

This article addresses the phenomenon of globalization and its consequences on the current political decision-making processes, considering the great influence of the decisions emanating from each autonomous state in an international basis. Based on this premise, a transnationalization of the public sphere, concept, initially developed by Jürgen Habermas, is suggested, in which the discussions held by citizens end up forming a public opinion on a given matter. That said, the analytical method is used, exercising a deductive reasoning based on the conclusions verified in the specialized bibliography to question the possibility of considering the internet as a globalized public sphere, in which the interactions of users allowed the formation of the public opinion theorized by Habermas. The analysis allowed us to conclude that, although the influence of the internet on the formation of a global public opinion is undeniable, limitations such as the absence of universality, full accessibility, and economic and political interferences prevent the virtual environment from being considered, in fact, a public sphere, as initially conceptualized by Habermas. Therefore, meanwhile its restrictions are not properly resolved, the internet can be used as a tool to complement the existing public sphere, with the potential to promote public engagement and democratic participation, playing a great role in the revitalization of democratic spaces.

References

BROWN, Garret Wallace; HELD, David. Editor’s introduction. In: BROWN, Garret Wallace; HELD, David (Org.). The cosmopolitanism reader. Cambridge: Polity, 2010.

FRASER, Nancy. Transnationalizing the public sphere: on the legitimacy and efficacy of public opinion in a post-westphalian world. Theory, culture & society, Los Angeles, v. 24, n. 4, p. 7-30, jul. 2007.

FUCHS, Christian. Social media end the public sphere. Triple C: communication, capitalism & critique, [s. l.], v. 12, n. 1, p. 57-101, fev. 2014. Disponível em: https://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/552. Acesso em: 09 jun. 2024.

GIMMLER, A. Deliberative democracy, the public sphere and the internet. Philosophy & social criticism, v. 27, n. 4, p.21–39, 2001.

GOMES, W. Esfera pública política e comunicação em Direito e Democracia de Jürgen Habermas. In: Gomes, W; Maia R. C. M. Comunicação e Democracia: problemas e perspectivas. São Paulo: Paulus, 2008.

HABERMAS, Jürgen. The structural transformation of the public sphere. 5. ed. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1993.

HELD, David; MAFFETTONE, Pietro. Moral Cosmopolitanism and democratic values. Global policy, Durham, v. 8, n. 6, p. 54-64, 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12412. Acesso em: 27 jun. 2023.

INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS UNION. Global connectivity report 2022. Genebra, 2022. Disponível em: https://www.itu.int/itu-d/reports/statistics/global-connectivity-report-2022/. Acesso em: 09 jun. 2024.

LEMOS, André. Nova esfera conversacional. In: MARQUES, Ângela et al. (Orgs.). Esfera pública, redes e jornalismo. Rio de Janeiro: E-papers, 2009.

MACKINNON, Rebecca. China’s censorship 2.0: how companies censor bloggers. First monday, [s. l.], v. 14, n. 2, fev. 2009. Disponível em: https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2378. Acesso em: 09 jun. 2024.

MCMAHON, Liv. Quanto tempo irá demorar para o TikTok ser banido dos EUA? 7 questões para entender nova lei. BBC News Brasil, [s. l.], 24 abr. 2024. Disponível em: https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/articles/cw4d03nqqwyo. Acesso em: 09 jun. 2024.

MARQUES, F. P. J. A. Debates políticos na internet: a perspectiva da conversação civil. Opinião Pública, Campinas, v. 12, n.1, p. 164-187, 2006.

REHMAN, Ikhlaq ur. Facebook-Cambridge Analytica data harvesting: what you need to know. Library philosophy and practice, Lincoln, 2019. Disponível em: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/2497/. Acesso em: 09 jun. 2024.

RIBAS, Carolline Leal; SILVA, Amaury. Redes sociais e esfera pública: a legitimação da participação política no cenário democrático brasileiro. Revista de direitos humanos e efetividade, Florianópolis, v. 6, n. 1, p. 23–42, 2020. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-0022/2020.v6i1.6375. Acesso em: 27 jun. 2023.

SAMPAIO, Rafael Cardoso. BARROS, Chalini Torquato Gonçalves de. Internet como esfera pública? Análise de usos e repercussões reais das discussões virtuais. Cadernos PPG-AU/UFBA, [s. l.], v. 9, n.1, p. 161-183, 2011. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/ppgau/article/view/5114. Acesso em: 01 jul. 2023.

SILVEIRA, S. A. Esfera pública interconetada, blogosfera e redes sociais. In: MARQUES, Ângela et al. (Orgs.). Esfera pública, redes e jornalismo. Rio de Janeiro: E-papers, 2009.

TERRA, Carolina Frazon; SOUSA, Gisela Maria Santos Ferreira de. Opinião pública em tempos de mídias sociais: midiatização, comunicação desintermediada e memes. In: Anais do 13º Congresso Brasileiro Científico de comunicação organizacional e de relações públicas. São Paulo, 2019. Disponível em: https://abrapcorp2.org.br/site/manager/arq/(cod2_22591)CarolTerra_GiselaSousa_GT6_Abrapcorp_2019.pdf. Acesso em: 27 jun. 2023.

Published

2024-09-11

How to Cite

Amorim, J. V. L., & Marchetto, P. B. (2024). The formation of a virtual public sphere and its influence on the decision-making process with global repercussions. Human Rights and Democracy Journal, 12(24), e15951. https://doi.org/10.21527/2317-5389.2024.24.15951