Accuracy of the Bedside pews scale in determining clinical deterioration upon admission of pediatric patients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21527/2176-7114.2025.50.14888Keywords:
Hospital admission service, Children's health, Patient safety, Pediatric Nursing, Early warning scoreAbstract
Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of Bedside PEWS in determining clinical deterioration in pediatric patients upon admission. Method: Cross-sectional and retrospective study. A sample of 591 medical records of children admitted to a pediatric emergency department between January and December 2018. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. For each Bedside PEWS cutoff point, sensitivity and specificity were estimated, using transfer to intensive care as the outcome. A Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed based on these values. Results: Upon emergency admission, for PEWS >4, the ROC curve accuracy was 76.9%, with a sensitivity of 59.1% and specificity of 78.0% (p<0.001). Upon transfer from the emergency department, for PEWS >5, the ROC curve accuracy was 87.4%, with a sensitivity of 72.6% and specificity of 94.3% (p<0.001). Conclusions: Bedside PEWS is a valid tool for assessing clinical deterioration in children, with PEWS ≥5 being the most reliable indicator.
References
1. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Pediatric Emergency Medicine, American College of Emergency Physicians, Pediatric Emergency Medicine Committee, Emergency Nurses Association Pediatric Committee. Handoffs: transitions of care for children in the emergency department. Pediatrics. 2016;138(5), e20162680. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2016-2680
2. Miranda JOF, Camargo CL, Nascimento SCL, Portela DS, Monaghan A. Accuracy of a pediatric early warning score in the recognition of clinical deterioration. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem [Internet]. 2017; 25:e2912. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.1733.2912
3. Miranda JOF, Camargo CL, Nascimento Sobrinho CL, Oliveira TL, Matos ACGT, Portela DS. Reproducibility and applicability of a pediatric score of clinical deterioration warning. REME – Rev Min Enferm. 2019[cited ];23:e-1156. Available from: DOI: 10.5935/1415-2762.20190003.
4. Miranda JOF, Camargo CL, Nascimento SCL, Portela DS, Pinho PS, Oliveira TL. Factors associated with the clinical deterioration recognized by an early warning pediatric score. Texto Contexto Enfermagem [Internet]. 2020; 29:e20180348. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-265X-TCE-2018-0348
5. Parshuram CS, Hutchison J, Middaugh K. Development and initial validation of the Bedside Paediatric Early Warning System score. Crit Care. 2009;13(4):R135. doi: 10.1186/cc7998
6. Adherence to the bedside paediatric early warning system (BedsidePEWS) in a pediatric tertiary care hospital. Gawronski et al. BMC Health Services Research (2021) 21:852 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06809-2
7. Oliveira ALG, Silvino ZR, Souza CJ. Translation of knowledge in the Implementation of the nursing process in a neonatal unit Traducción de conocimientos en la implementación del proceso de enfermería en una unidad neonatal. Research, Society and Development, v. 10, n. 8, e23110817263, 2021 (CC BY 4.0) | ISSN 2525-3409 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i8.17263
8. Silva MF, Anders JC, Rocha PK, Silva MOV, Souza S, Carneiro ES. Transfer between hospital units: implications of communication on pediatric patient safety. Revista de enfermagem UFPE online. 2017;11(10):3813-20. DOI: 10.5205/reuol.12834-30982-1-SM.1110201715
9. Wooldridge AR, Carayon P, Hoonakker P, Hose BZ, Ross J, Kohler JE et al. Complexity of the pediatric trauma care process: implications for multi-level awareness. Cognition, Technology & Work 2019; 21(3):397-416. doi: 10.1007/s10111-018-0520-0
10. Rodríguez-Acelas AL, Cañon-Montañez W. Contributions of healt scales as tools that influence decisions in patient care. Rev Cuid. 2018; 9(1): 1949-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.15649/cuidarte.v9i1.498
11. Fuijkschot J et al. Validation of a Paediatric Early Warning Score: first results and implications of usage. Eur. J. Pediatr, 2015;174(1):15-21. doi: 10.1007/s00431-014-2357-8.
12. Volpatto BM, Wegner W, Gerhardt LM, Pedro ENR, Cruz SS, Bandeira LEB. Medication erros in pediatrics and prevention strategies:integrative review. Cogitare Enferm. 2017;22(1): e45132. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/ce.v22i1.45132
13. D’Errico et al. Medication Errors in Pediatrics. Frontiers in Medicine. January 2022. Volume 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.814100
14. Pereira FS, Silveira MS, Hoffmann LM, Peres MA, Breigeiron MK, Wegner W. Perception of the multidisciplinar team regarding pediatric patient safety in critical áreas. Rev. Enferm. UFSM, Santa Maria, v11, e42: p. 1-20, 2021. DOI: 10.5902/2179769255250
15. Mcelroy T, Swarts EN, Hassani K, Waibel S, Tuff Y, Marshall C et al. Implementation study of a 5-component pediatric early warning system (PEWS) in an emergency department in British Columbia, Canada, to inform provincial scale up. Bmc Emergency Medicine. 2019; 19(1): 1-14. doi: 10.1186/s12873-019-0287-5.
16. Dias FLT, Mendonça FD, Pinto GM, Borges ISC, Oliveira SV. Doenças respiratórias no Triângulo Mineiro: Análise epidemiológica e projetiva com a pandemia de COVID-19. J Health Biol Sci. 2020 J; 8(1):1-6. doi: 10.12662/2317-3219jhbs.v8i1.3206.p1-6.2020
17. Amthauer C, Cunha MLC. Manchester Triage System: main flowcharts, discriminators and outcomes of a pediatric emergency care. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem. 2016; 24: e2779. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.1078.2779
18. Passos SD, Maziero FF, Antoniassi DQ, Souza LT, Felix AF, Dotta E et al. Acute respiratory diseases in Brazilian children: are caregivers able to detect the first warning signs?. Rev. Paul. Pediat. 2018; 36(1): 3-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-0462/;2018;36;1;00008
19. Lovie-Toon YG, Chang AB, Newcombe PA, Vagenas D, Anderson-James S, Drescher BJ et al. Longitudinal study of quality of life among children with acute respiratory infection and cough. Quali. Life Res. 2018; 27(4): 891-903. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1779-y.
20. Paixão TCR, Campanharo CRV, Lopes MCBT, Okuno MFP, Batista REA. Nursing sizing in the emergency room of a teaching hospital. Rev. esc. enferm. USP online. 2015; 49(3): 481-487. DOI: 10.1590/S0080-623420150000300017
21. Zambonin F, Lima KLB, Brito AR, Brito TB, Amorim RF, Caldart RV. Classification of emergency patients according to their dependency on nursing. Rev enferm UFPE on line. 2019; 13(4): 1133-1141. DOI: 10.5205/1981-8963-v13i04a236792p1133-1141-2019
22. Mendonça, JG, Guimarães MJB, Mendonça VG, Portugal JL, Mendonça CG. Profile of hospitalizations in Pediatric Intensive Care Units of the Brazilian Unified Health System in the state of Pernambuco, Brazil. Ciênc. Saúde Coletiva. 2019; 24(3): 907-916. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018243.02152017
23. Parshuram CS et al. Multicentre validation of the bedside paediatric early warning system score: a severity of illness score to detect evolving critical illness in hospitalised children. Crit Care. 2011; 15(4):R184. doi: 10.1186/cc10337
24. Seiger N, Maconochie I, Oostenbrink R, Moll HA. Validity of different pediatric early warning scores in the emergency department. Pediatrics. 2013; 132(4): 841-850. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-3594.
25. Lambert V, Matthews A, MacDonell R, Fitzsimons J. Paediatric early warning systems for detecting and responding to clinical deterioration in children: a systematic review. BMJ Open. [online]. 2017; 7(3): e014497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014497
26. Trubey R et al. Validity and effectiveness of paediatric early warning systems and track and trigger tools for identifying and reducing clinical deterioration in hospitalised children: a systematic review. Bmj Open. 2019; 9(5): e022105. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022105
27. Corfield F, Langdon D. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Brief Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS). Neurol Ther. 2018; 7(2): 287-306. doi: 10.1007/s40120-018-0102-3
28. 11 Fuijkschot J et al. Validation of a Paediatric Early Warning Score: first results and implications of usage. Eur. J. Pediatr, 2015;174(1):15-21. doi: 10.1007/s00431-014-2357-8.
29. Borsa JC, Damásio BF, Bandeira DR. Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of Psychological Instruments: Some Considerations. Paidéia. 2012; 22(53): 423-432. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-863X2012000300014
30. Lino CRM, Bruggemann OM, Souza ML, Barbosa SFF, Santos EKA. The Cross-cultural adaptation of research instruments, conducted by nurses in Brazil: an integrative review. Texto Contexto – enferm [online]. 2018; 26(4): e1730017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-07072017001730017
31. Lucena AF, Bavaresco T, Menegon DB, Schneider SMB, Medeiros RM, Souza CMB. Laser in wounds translation of knowledge to na effective and innovation practive in nursing. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. 2021;42:e20200396. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2021.20200396
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Contexto & Saúde
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Autores que publicam na Revista Contexto & Saúde concordam com os seguintes termos:
a) A submissão de trabalho(s) científico(s) original(is) pelos autores, na qualidade de titulares do direito de autor do(s) texto(s) enviado(s) ao periódico, nos termos da Lei 9.610/98, implica na cessão de direitos autorais de publicação na Revista Contexto e Saúde do(s) artigo(s) aceitos para publicação à Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, autorizando-se, ainda, que o(s) trabalho(s) científico(s) aprovado(s) seja(m) divulgado(s) gratuitamente, sem qualquer tipo de ressarcimento a título de direitos autorais, por meio do site da revista e suas bases de dados de indexação e repositórios, para fins de leitura, impressão e/ou download do arquivo do texto, a partir da data de aceitação para fins de publicação. Isto significa que, ao procederem a submissão do(s) artigo(s) à Revista Contexto e Saúde e, por conseguinte, a cessão gratuita dos direitos autorais relacionados ao trabalho científico enviado, os autores têm plena ciência de que não serão remunerados pela publicação do(s) artigo(s) no periódico.
b). Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
c). Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
d). Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).
