Caregivers' perspective on bonding with institutionalized children and adolescents

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21527/2176-7114.2025.50.14953

Keywords:

caregivers, child, institutionalized, adolescent, institutionalized, interpersonal relations, nursing theory

Abstract

Objective: This study aims at exploring caregivers' perspectives on the bond established in the care of institutionalized children and adolescents. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted with ten caregivers from a child and adolescent care institution in southern Brazil. The participants were selected based on two inclusion criteria: direct involvement in child and adolescent care and minimum tenure of three months at the institution. Data collection took place between October and November 2020 through semi-structured interviews. The data underwent directed content analysis guided by Watson's Human Care Theory, which served as grounds for developing the initial coding framework. Results: Two categories were obtained: The bond as a form of transpersonal care, which allowed understanding the transpersonal relationships proposed by Jean Watson as a form of care established through the bond between the caregiver and the person cared for; and Care work in bond formation and disruption, which provided insights into how attachment influences the establishment and dissolution of caregiver-child relationships. Conclusion: It is essential to foster bonds and attachment in transpersonal relationships, particularly in the care of children and adolescents, where the caregiver's role is indispensable. Within institutional care settings, providing emotional support and recognition is crucial for enabling caregivers to establish attachment-based relationships, which are fundamental to children's and adolescents' development, especially in the deinstitutionalization context.

References

1. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente. Lei nº 8.069 de 13 de Julho de 1990. Brasília (DF): Ministério da Saúde; 2021 [citado 2023 ago. 02], 232 telas. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/mdh/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/2021/julho/trinta-e-um-anos-do-estatuto-da-crianca-e-do-adolescente-confira-as-novas-acoes-para-fortalecer-o-eca/ECA2021_Digital.pdf

2. Gabatz RIB, Schwartz E, Milbrath VM. Institutional caregiver experiences in child care. Esc. Anna Nery Rev. Enferm. 2019;23(2):e20180195. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-9465-EAN-2018-0195

3. Souza FHO, Altoé S, LF. Ateliê Lúdico e Expressivo: Considerações sobre o Brincar com Crianças Acolhidas. Estud. pesqui. psicol. 2021; 21(esp.): 1313-29. doi: https://doi.org/10.12957/epp.2021.63942

4. Parra ACO, Oliveira JA, Maturana APM. O paradoxo da institucionalização infantil: proteção ou risco?. Psicol. rev. (Belo Horizonte). 2019; 25 (1): 155-175. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5752/P.1678-9563.2019v25n1p155-175

5. Gabatz RIB, Schwartz E, Milbrath VM, Carvalho HCW, Lange C, Soares MC. Formation and disruption of bonds between caregivers and institutionalized children. Rev. bras. enferm. 2018;71(6):2650-8. doi: http://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0844

6. George JB. Teorias de enfermagem: os fundamentos para a prática profissional. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas; 2001.

7. Lemos SCA, Gechele HHL, Andrade JV. Os Vínculos Afetivos no Contexto de Acolhimento Institucional: Um Estudo de Campo. Psicol. teor. pesqui. 2017;33:e3334. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e3334

8. Menezes TMO, Andrade AMB, Freitas AVS, Moura HCGB, Freitas RA, Pires IB. Nursing reception and care in the family health strategy: perceptions of the elderly person. REME rev. min. enferm. 2020;24:e-1304. doi: https://doi.org/10.5935/1415-2762.20200041

9. Ito SI, Azevedo AVS. Social Educadores sociais em abrigos destinados a crianças e adolescentes: revisão sistemática. Contextos Clín. 2021;14(1):276-303. doi: https://doi.org/10.4013/ctc.2021.141.13

10. Saur B, Bruck I, Antoniuk A, Riechi TIJS. Relação entre vínculo de apego e desenvolvimento cognitivo, linguístico e motor. Psico (Porto Alegre). 2018;49(3):257-65. doi: https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-8623.2018.3.27248

11. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int. J. Qual. Health Care. 2007;19(6):349-57. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042

12. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9): 1277-88. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

13. Tonin L, Nascimento , Lacerda MR, Favero L, Gomes IM, Denipote AGM. Guide to deliver the elements of the Clinical Caritas Process. Esc. Anna Nery Rev. Enferm. 2017; 21(4):e20170034. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-9465-EAN-2017-0034

14. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Resolução CNS n°466, de 12 de dezembro de 2012. Aprova diretrizes e normas regulamentadoras de pesquisas envolvendo seres humanos. Diário Oficial da União. Brasília; 2013[citado 2023 ago. 02]; Disponível em: https://conselho.saude.gov.br/resolucoes/2012/Reso466.pdf

15. Riegel F, Crossetti MGO, Siqueira DS. Contributions of Jean Watson's theory to holistic critical thinking of nurses. Rev. bras. enferm. 2018;71(4):2072-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0065

16. Maldonado, CM. Agentes del sistema de protección en Uruguay: sentidos del cuidado. Rev. polis psique. 2019 [citado 2023 ago. 02]; 9(3): 190-212. Disponível em: http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/pdf/rpps/v9n3/v9n3a12.pdf

17. Sánchez-Reyes JE, Cantor-Jiménez J, Castro-Sardi X, Bolaños Y. Concepciones de niño y modos de relación de cuidadores y profesionales con niños institucionalizados, Colombia. Rev. latinoam. cienc. soc. niñez juv. 2019 ; 17(2):193-217. doi: https://doi.org/10.11600/1692715x.17209.

18. Ito SI, Azevêdo AVS. Narratives of Photographic Records of the Practices of Social Educators of a Residential Group Home for Children and Adolescents. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto, Online). 2022; 32: e3215. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e3215

19. Lemos IC, Silva RBF. Cuidado de crianças em acolhimento institucional: relações afetivas e dimensão temporal. Psi Unisc. 2019;3(1):173-91. doi: https://doi.org/10.17058/psiunisc.v1i3.11892

20. Guerrero-Castañeda RF, Chávez-Urías RA. Momento de cuidado, un encuentro fenomenológico entre enfermera y persona cuidada: reflexión en Watson. Cult. cuid. 2020;24(58):7-18. doi: https://doi.org/10.14198/cuid.2020.58.02

21. Neder K, Ferreira LDMP, Amorim KS. Coconstrução do apego no primeiro semestre de vida: o papel do outro nessa constituição. Psicol. USP. 2020;31:e190143. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6564e190143

22. Rodrigues LHF; Prebianchi HB. Estresse e Estratégias de Enfrentamento em Crianças e Adolescentes em Acolhimento Institucional em Casas Lares. Psicol. ciênc. prof. 2021; 41(spe3): e192765. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-3703003192765

23. Almeida FA, Souza DF, Miranda CB. The experience told by the child who lives in a shelter through therapeutic play. Cienc. Saude Colet. 2021; 26(2): 435-444. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232021262.40762020

24. Paiva IL, Moreira TAS, Lima AM. Acolhimento Institucional: famílias de origem e a reinstitucionalização. Rev. Direito Práx. 2019;10(2):1405-29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8966/2019/40414

25. Gabatz RIB, Schwartz E, Milbrath VM. Experiências de cuidado da criança institucionalizada: o lado oculto do trabalho. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. 2019;40:e20180412. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1983- 1447.2019.20180412.

Published

2025-03-17

How to Cite

Bório, T. da C., Gabatz, R. I. B., Milbrath, V. M., Vaz, J. C., Gomes, N. P., & Farias, T. A. (2025). Caregivers’ perspective on bonding with institutionalized children and adolescents. Revista Contexto & Saúde, 25(50), e14953. https://doi.org/10.21527/2176-7114.2025.50.14953

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLE