The Un’s Committee Against Torture Verdict Against Bosnia: A Landmark Decision In The Context Of Sexual Violence In Armed Conflicts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21527/2176-6622.2022.57.10193Keywords:
Sexual violence, Armed conflicts, Committee Against Torture, International LawAbstract
This paper aims to analyze the decision of the UN’s Committee Against Torture, from August 2019, that found Bosnia guilty of sexual violence that occured during the Yugoslav war. Considering that sexual crimes in armed conflicts are predominantly an instrument of war, instead of a consequence, this paper firstly analyzes the evolution of international legislation and precedents on the subject, using a descriptive method. Secondly, it considers the Committee’s decision, which includes the case summary, competence discussions and the impacts of the decision on the development of the sexual violence subject in international law. This second part is based on a qualitative method. Among the conclusions, the Committee’s decision appears as a historical and legal milestone when it comes to sexual violence in armed conflicts, revealing not only a new permanent institution to judge similar cases, but also condemning the State and providing a more effective way to repair the damage caused to the victims, compared with the other international courts.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
By publishing in the Revista Direito em Debate, authors agree to the following terms:
Articles are licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0), which allows:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format;
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use.
These permissions are irrevocable, provided the following terms are respected:
Attribution — authors must be properly credited, with a link to the license and indication of any modifications made;
No additional restrictions — no legal or technological measures may be applied that restrict the use permitted by the license.
Notices:
The license does not apply to elements in the public domain or covered by legal exceptions.
The license does not grant all rights required for specific uses (e.g., image rights, privacy, or moral rights).
The journal is not responsible for opinions expressed in the articles, which remain the sole responsibility of the authors. The Editor, with the support of the Editorial Committee, reserves the right to suggest or request modifications when necessary.
Only original scientific articles presenting research results of interest, not previously published or simultaneously submitted to another journal with the same purpose, will be accepted.
References to trademarks or specific products are intended solely for identification purposes and do not imply any promotional endorsement by the authors or the journal.
License Agreement (for articles published as of 2026): Authors retain copyright over their articles and grant the Revista Direito em Debate the right of first publication.
