OS LIMITES DA ATUAÇÃO DA ADVOCACIA-GERAL DA UNIÃO NA POLÍTICA ESTATAL DE “DESJUDICIALIZAÇÃO”

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE´S PERFORMANCE LIMITS IN THE STATE POLICY ON “DEJUDICIALIZATION”

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21527/2176-6622.2021.55.78-88

Keywords:

Alternative dispute resolution, Union Attorney General, Legislation, Dejudicialization, Peaceful settlement of disputes

Abstract

In this article, we analyzed the main obstacles and alternatives for the participation of Federal Government's, through the Attorney General's Office (AGU), in the policy of alternative dispute resolution (ADR), which was adopted by the Code of Civil Procedure in 2015. The analysis was carried out from the perspective of the postulate of dejudicialization and considers the scenario of the litigation crisis within the Brazilian Judiciary. The descriptive methodology was used, pointing out some of the main problems and gains of the use of alternative dispute resolution management, concluding that, although Brazil has adopted the referred policy of dejudicialization it was not accompanied by the proper structuring and instrumentalization of a considerable number of institutions legitimized to carry it out so that they could exercise it fully and effectively. As a result, the difficulties encountered by the AGU, illustrated in this paper, but which afflict a considerable part of the State representatives are verified, which legitimizes the study and challenges the law operator to seek systematic solutions to this problem.

Author Biographies

Daniel Mota Gutiérrez, Centro Universitário Christus

Doutor em Direito pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC/SP). Mestre pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC/SP). Especialista em Direito Processual Civil pela Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor). Bacharel em Direito pela Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor). Professor do Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus), desde 2015. Professor da Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor), de 2003 a 2005. Advogado. Atuação com ênfase em Direito Processual Civil, Direito Constitucional Processual, Processo Coletivo e Transação.

Natália Ribeiro Machado Vilar, Centro Universitário Christus

Mestre em Direito pelo Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus). Especialista em Direito Processual Civil pela Faculdade Autônoma de Direito (Fadisp). Bacharel em Direito pela Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor). Advogada da União, na Advocacia-Geral da União, desde 2009. Área de atuação: Direito; Direito Público; Direito Processual; Direito Administrativo. Pesquisa: Acesso à Justiça; Direito ao Desenvolvimento; Litigiosidade brasileira; Economia Comportamental; Análise Econômica do Direito.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-02

How to Cite

Gutiérrez, D. M., & Vilar, N. R. M. (2021). OS LIMITES DA ATUAÇÃO DA ADVOCACIA-GERAL DA UNIÃO NA POLÍTICA ESTATAL DE “DESJUDICIALIZAÇÃO”: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE´S PERFORMANCE LIMITS IN THE STATE POLICY ON “DEJUDICIALIZATION”. Revista Direito Em Debate, 30(55), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.21527/2176-6622.2021.55.78-88

Issue

Vol. 30 No. 55 (2021): Revista Direito em Debate

Section

ARTICLES

License

By publishing in the Revista Direito em Debate, authors agree to the following terms:

Articles are licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0), which allows:

Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format;
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use.

These permissions are irrevocable, provided the following terms are respected:

Attribution — authors must be properly credited, with a link to the license and indication of any modifications made;

No additional restrictions — no legal or technological measures may be applied that restrict the use permitted by the license.

Notices:

The license does not apply to elements in the public domain or covered by legal exceptions.
The license does not grant all rights required for specific uses (e.g., image rights, privacy, or moral rights).
The journal is not responsible for opinions expressed in the articles, which remain the sole responsibility of the authors. The Editor, with the support of the Editorial Committee, reserves the right to suggest or request modifications when necessary.
Only original scientific articles presenting research results of interest, not previously published or simultaneously submitted to another journal with the same purpose, will be accepted.

References to trademarks or specific products are intended solely for identification purposes and do not imply any promotional endorsement by the authors or the journal.

License Agreement (for articles published as of 2026): Authors retain copyright over their articles and grant the Revista Direito em Debate the right of first publication.