Staphylococcus spp. and mecA gene in pregnant women: a neglected health risk to mother and child
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21527/2176-7114.2024.48.13941Keywords:
Antibiotics, Epidemiology, Methicillin, Pregnancy, Resistance genes, Staphylococcal carriageAbstract
This study aimed to determine the phenotypic, molecular and epidemiological profile of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus spp. in pregnant women. Were included 100 asymptomatic pregnant women between 16 and 38 years old, who underwent microbiological examination by collecting a vaginal swab at the first trimester of pregnancy. The isolates were subjected to isolation, characterization, phenotypic and molecular tests were performed. Among the samples analyzed, were detected coagulase-negative Staphylococcus in 83%, coagulase-positive Staphylococcus, 6% and Streptococcus spp. in 5%, and there was no bacterial growth in 6%. The antibiotics that showed the highest resistance were amoxicillin + clavulanic acid and sulfamethoxazole + trimethoprim (92.77%) in coagulase-negative Staphylococcus and penicillin and sulfamethoxazole + trimethoprim in coagulase-positive Staphylococcus (100%), where in the latter S. aureus was the species identified in 66.67% of the samples. As for the identification of the mecA gene in Staphylococcus spp. samples, this gene was detected in 40.5% of the samples of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, and it was not detected in the samples of coagulase-positive Staphylococcus. The epidemiological study showed that prior treatment with antibiotics was significantly (p≤0.016) associated with oxacillin resistance in vaginal swab samples. The presence of the mecA gene in coagulase-negative Staphylococcus isolates demonstrated a bacterial profile in this type of biological sample, different from what is already presented in the scientific literature. New studies are warranted to understand the epidemiology of the bacterial species involved and later to implement health education actions both in the target population and in health care professionals.
References
United Nations (UN). OMS: Mundo está ficando sem opções para combater superbactérias. 2020. Available at: https://news.un.org/pt/story/2020/01/1701012
Gomes MJP. Gênero Staphylococcus spp. 2011. Available at: http://www.ufrgs.br/labacvet/files/G%C3%AAnero%20Staphylococcus%20spp%204-2013-1.pdf.
Silva ACO, Oliveira SR, Silva RCG. Clindamycin microbial resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus sp. derived from blood cultures of hospitalized patients. J. Bras. Patol. Med. Lab. 2016;52:165-170.
Svidzinski AE, Posseto I, Pádua RAF, et al. Eficiência do ácido peracético no controle de Staphylococcus aureus meticilina resistente. Ciênc. Cuid. Saúde. 2007;6:312-318.
Cerqueira ES, Almeida RCC. Staphylococcus aureus resistente à meticilina (MRSA) em alimentos de origem animal: uma revisão sistemática. Rev. Inst. Adolfo Lutz. 2013;72:268-281.
Stefani S, Chung DR, Lindsay JA, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): global epidemiology and harmonization of typing methods. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2012;39:273-282.
Petersdorf S, Herma M, Rosenblatt M, et al. A Novel Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec Type XI Primer for Detection of mecC-Harboring Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Directly from Screening Specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2015;53:3.938-3.941.
Rajeh M, Sabra A, Kissoyan K, et al. Molecular characterization of staphylococcal cassete chromosome mec an virulence encoding genes in methicillin resistant staphylococci at a medical center in Lebanon. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2015;5:1-12.
Gelatti LC, Sukiennik T, Becker AP, et al. Sepse por Staphylococus aureus resistente à meticilina adquirida na comunidade no sul do Brasil. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2009;42:458-460.
Bastos Ribeiro RA, Albuquerque RP, Rodrigues MRA, et al. Perfil epidemiológico de mulheres com vaginose em exame papanicolaou de uma unidade de saúde de Belém-PA. Rev. Eletrônica Acervo Cient. 2020;9:e3046-e3046.
Souza GN, Vieira TCSB, Campos AAS, et al. Tratamento das vulvovaginites na gravidez. Femina – Febrasgo. 2012;40:126-128.
Milhomens PM, Machado MCAM, Moraes FC, et al. Prevalência dos agentes etiológicos das vulvovaginites através de resultados de exames citopatológicos. Rev. Inv. Biom. 2014;6:92-102.
Silva AMHP, Medeiros JT, Eleuterio RMN, et al. Sazonal frequency of Bacterial vaginosis and Candida sp in Pap smears observed in a private laboratory in Fortaleza, Brazil, from 2012 to 2015. J. Bras. Doe. Sex. Trans. 2017;29:50-53.
Chen MD, Huard RC, Della-Latta P, et al. Prevalence of Methicillin-Sensitive and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Pregnant Women. Obstet. Gynecol. 2006;108:482-487.
Andrews WW, Schelonka R, Waites K, et al. Genital Tract Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Obstet. Gynecol. 2008;111:113-118.
Sorano S, Goto M, Matsuoka S, et al. Chorioamnionitis caused by Staphylococcus aureus with intact membranes in a term pregnancy: a case of maternal and fetal septic shock. J. Infect. Chemother. 2016;22:261-264.
Zamfir M, Adler AC, Kolb S, et al. Evaluation of sampling locations in pregnant women and newborns for the detection of colonisation with antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2017;36:1.819-1.826.
Rodrigues PC. Bioestatística. 3. ed. Niterói: EDUFF; 2002.
Brasil. Organização Pan-Americana de Saúde. Organização Mundial de Saúde. Novos dados revelam níveis elevados de resistência aos antibióticos em todo o mundo (on-line). 2018. Available at: https://www.paho.org/bra/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=5592:novos-dados-revelam-niveis-elevados-de-resistencia-aos-antibioticos-em-todo-o-mundo&Itemid=812.
Koneman EW, Allen S. Diagnostico microbiologico/microbiological diagnosis: texto y atlas em color/text and color atlas. Buenos Aires: Médica Panamericana; 2008.
Brazilian Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Tabelas de pontos de corte para interpretação de CIMs e diâmetros de halos. 2023. Available at: http://brcast.org.br/documentos/.
Krumperman PH. Multiple antibiotic resistance indexing of Escherichia coli to identify high-risk sources of fecal contamination of foods. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1983;46:165-170.
Martineau F, Picard FJ, Roy PH, et al. Species-specific and ubiquitous-DNA-based assays for rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1998;36:618-623.
Murakami K, Minamide W, Wada K, et al. Identification of methicillin-resistant strains of staphylococci by polymerase chain reaction. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1991;29:2.240-2.244.
Gelatti LC, Becker AN, Bonamigo RR, et al. Staphylococcus aureus resistentes à meticilina: disseminação emergente na comunidade. An. Bras. Dermatol. 2009;84:501-506.
Giuffrè M, Bonura C, Cipolla D, et al. MRSA infection in the neonatal intensive care unit. Expert. Rev. Anti. Infect. Ther. 2013;11:499-509. DOI: 10.1586/ERI.13.28. PMID: 23627856.
Kim TH, Seap B, Kim SA, et al. Vulvar abscess caused by Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in a postmenopausal woman. J. Menopausal Med. 2016;22:118-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6118/jmm.2016.22.2.118
Riboli DFM, Barbosa TA, Cunha MLRS. Staphylococcus aureus infections in newborns. In: Cunha MLRS. Staphylococcus aureus: Infection, Treatment and Risk Assessment. New York: Nova Medical. 2017.
Thurman AR, Satterfield TM, Soper DE. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus as a common cause of vulvar abscesses. Obstet. Gynecol. 2008;112:538-544.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Contexto & Saúde

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By publishing in Revista Contexto & Saúde, authors agree to the following terms:
The works are licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0) license, which allows:
Share — to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format;
Adapt — to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial.
These permissions are irrevocable, provided that the following terms are respected:
Attribution — authors must be properly credited, with a link to the license and indication of any changes made.
No additional restrictions — no legal or technological measures may be applied that restrict the use permitted by the license.
Notes:
The license does not apply to elements in the public domain or covered by legal exceptions.
The license does not grant all rights necessary for specific uses (e.g., image rights, privacy, or moral rights).
The journal is not responsible for opinions expressed in the articles, which are the sole responsibility of the authors. The Editor, with the support of the Editorial Board, reserves the right to suggest or request modifications when necessary.
Only original scientific articles presenting research results of interest that have not been published or simultaneously submitted to another journal with the same objective will be accepted.
Mentions of trademarks or specific products are intended solely for identification purposes, without any promotional association by the authors or the journal.
License Agreement (for articles published from September 2025): Authors retain copyright over their article and grant Revista Contexto & Saúde the right of first publication.