Evidence of the effectiveness of caries risk management models
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21527/2176-7114.2026.51.16820Keywords:
Dental caries, Risk management, Disease prevention, Oral healthAbstract
The search for a more comprehensive approach to oral health has led to the analysis of care models that integrate biophysical, psychological, and social dimensions, recognizing the complex interaction between these factors. Objective: To analyze the evidence of the effectiveness of caries risk management models for the adult population. Methods: This is a systematic review based on the PRISMA Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews. The search was conducted in the PubMed, SciELO; Scopus, and Web of Science databases in November 2024. Results: A total of 1,695 articles were identified, 1,633 of which were excluded in the screening process; 13 articles were included in this review. The studies applied software for caries risk management to 8,641 participants. The most widely used software in the adult population was Cariogram. A direct association was found between Cariogram risk categories and caries prevalence, experience, and severity. Risk factors such as previous history of the disease, salivary flow rate, mutans streptococcus levels, and dietary and oral hygiene habits have been found to be strong predictors of future caries incidence. Genetic factors, specific medical conditions, unique microbial characteristics, and even individual response to treatments can significantly influence caries risk. Conclusion: Caries risk management is a promising approach for the prevention and control of this disease. The use of software and applications can facilitate risk assessment and the creation of personalized treatment plans.
References
1.Petersen PE. Sociobehavioural risk factors in dental caries – international perspectives. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 2005, 33(4):274–279, 2005. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2005.00235.x
2.GBD 2017 Oral Disorders Collaborators. Global, Regional, and National Levels and Trends in Burden of Oral Conditions from 1990 to 2017: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease 2017 Study. J Dent Res 2020; 99(4):362-373.
3.Miotto MHM de B, Barcellos LA, Velten DB. Avaliação do impacto na qualidade de vida causado por problemas bucais na população adulta e idosa em município da Região Sudeste. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. 2012 fev., 17(2):397–405. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232012000200014
4.Tellez M, Gomez J, Pretty I, Ellwood R, Ismail AI. Evidence on existing caries risk assessment systems: are they predictive of future caries? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2013;41:67–78.
5.Arrica M, Carta G, Cocco F, et al. Does a social/behavioural gradient in dental health exist among adults? A cross-sectional study. J Int Med Res. 2017;45:451–61.
6.American Dental Association. Caries diagnosis and risk assessment. A review of preventive strategies and management. J Am Dent Assoc. 1995;126:1s–24s.
7.Featherstone, John D B et al. “A Comparison of Four Caries Risk Assessment Methods.”Frontiers in oral health vol. 2 656558. 28 Apr. 2021, doi:10.3389/froh.2021.656558
8.Moher, D.; Liberati, A.;Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D. G. PRISMA Group Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement PLoS Med.,v. 6, p.e1000097, 2009. Disponível em: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
9.Briscoe, Simon et al. “Conduct and reporting of citation searching in Cochrane systematic reviews: A cross-sectional study.”Research synthesis methods vol. 11,2 (2020): 169-180. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1355
10. Munn, Zachary1; Stone, Jennifer C.1; Aromataris, Edoardo1; Klugar, Miloslav2; Sears, Kim3; Leonardi-Bee, Jo4; Barker, Timothy Hugh1. Assessing the risk of bias of quantitative analytical studies: introducing the vision for critical appraisal within JBI systematic reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis 21(3):p 467-471, March 2023.
11.Joana Briggs Institute - JBI. The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers' manual 2015: Methodology for JBI scoping reviews; 2015. Disponível em: chrome-extension://oemmndcbldboiebfnladdacbdfmadadm/https://nursing.lsuhsc.edu/JBI/docs/ReviewersManuals/Scoping-.pdf.
12.Petersson GH, Fure S, Bratthall D. Evaluation of a computer-based caries risk assessment program in an elderly group of individuals. Acta Odontol Scand. 2003;61:164–71.
13.Sonbul H, Al-Otaibi M, Birkhed D. Risk profile of adults with several dental restorations using the Cariogram model. Acta Odontol Scand. 2008;66:351–7.
14.Ruiz Miravet A, Montiel Company JM, Almerich Silla JM. Evaluation of caries risk in a young adult population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2007;12:E412–8.
15,Peker I, Mangal T, Erten H, Gulcin A, Emre A, Gulcin A. Evaluation of caries risk in a young adult population using a computer-based risk assessment model (Cariogram). J Dent Sci. 2012;7:99–104.
16.Petersson GH, Twetman S. Caries risk assessment in young adults: a 3 year validation of the Cariogram model. BMC oral health. 2015;15:17.
17.Chaffee BW, Cheng J, Featherstone JD. Baseline caries risk assessment as a predictor of caries incidence. J Dent. 2015;43:518–24.
18. Dou L, Luo J, Fu X, Tang Y, Gao J, Yang D. The validity of caries risk assessment in young adults with past caries experience using a screening Cariogram model without saliva tests.Int Dent J. 2018;68(4):221-226. doi:10.1111/idj.12378
19.Carta G, Cagetti MG, Cocco F, Sale S, Lingström P, Campus G. Caries-risk profiles in Italian adults using computer caries assessment system and ICDAS. Braz Oral Res. 2015;29:S1806–83242015000100306.
20.Petersson GH, Ericson E, Isberg PE, et al. Caries risk assessment in Young adults: a 3-year validation of clinical guidelines used in public dental service. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013;71:1645–50.
21.Lee JH, Son HH, Kim HY, Chang J. Caries risk profiles of Korean dental patients using simplified Cariogram models. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013;71:899–905.
22.Chang J, Kim HY. Does caries risk assessment predict the incidence of caries for special needs patients requiring general anesthesia? Acta Odontol Scand. 2014;72:721–8.
23, Doitchinova L, Kirov D, Nikolova J, Topalova-Pirinska S. Caries Risk Assessment in Adults Using the Cariogram, Folia medica. 2020;62 4, 831-837.
24.Celik EU, Gokay N, Ates M. Efficiency of caries risk assessment in Young adults using Cariogram. Eur J Dent. 2012;6:270–9.
25.Chaffee BW, Cheng J, Featherstone JD. Baseline caries risk assessment as a predictor of caries incidence. J Dent. 2015;43:518–24.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Beatriz Cristina de Freitas, Márcia Maria Pereira Rendeiro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By publishing in Revista Contexto & Saúde, authors agree to the following terms:
The works are licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0) license, which allows:
Share — to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format;
Adapt — to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial.
These permissions are irrevocable, provided that the following terms are respected:
Attribution — authors must be properly credited, with a link to the license and indication of any changes made.
No additional restrictions — no legal or technological measures may be applied that restrict the use permitted by the license.
Notes:
The license does not apply to elements in the public domain or covered by legal exceptions.
The license does not grant all rights necessary for specific uses (e.g., image rights, privacy, or moral rights).
The journal is not responsible for opinions expressed in the articles, which are the sole responsibility of the authors. The Editor, with the support of the Editorial Board, reserves the right to suggest or request modifications when necessary.
Only original scientific articles presenting research results of interest that have not been published or simultaneously submitted to another journal with the same objective will be accepted.
Mentions of trademarks or specific products are intended solely for identification purposes, without any promotional association by the authors or the journal.
License Agreement (for articles published from September 2025): Authors retain copyright over their article and grant Revista Contexto & Saúde the right of first publication.
