A self-perception of ageism among elderly individuals during the covid-19 pandemic

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21527/2176-7114.2025.50.15784

Palabras clave:

Aging, discrimination, ageism

Resumen

The objective of the study was to analyze the self-perception of elderly individuals regarding ageism during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Amazonas state. A quantitative and qualitative study was conducted in Manaus, AM, with a sample population of 44 elderly individuals aged ≥ 60 years, of both sexes, who were affected by the COVID-19 pandemic from March 2020 to May 2023. The study was divided into two stages. The first stage consisted of a quantitative study, of the observational epidemiological type, cross-sectional, in which information was collected through the application of a Likert-type ageism self-perception scale. The second stage consisted of a qualitative study composed of two open-ended questions related to experiences of ageism during the COVID-19 pandemic by the research participants, who were interviewed in structured interviews, with 10 volunteers in total, representing a percentage of 20% of the participants. The results showed that 75% of the respondents experienced two or more situations of ageism. They self-reported two or more types of ageism compared to those who did not report ageism or reported only one type of ageism. In the qualitative analysis, mesostructural and macrostructural ageism, predominantly of explicit origin, were observed. We concluded that the COVID-19 pandemic increased instances of ageism experienced by elderly individuals in Manaus, particularly noting that this discrimination occurred among healthcare professionals and public transportation drivers. We acknowledge the study's sample size limitation and its focus on a specific elderly population. However, it is extremely important to establish strategies to combat ageism through strengthening and updating policies and laws, as well as educational and research interventions.

Citas

1- Naveca FG, Nascimento V, De Souza VC, et al. COVID-19 in Amazonas, Brazil, was driven by the persistence of endemic lineages and emergence of P.1. Nat Med. 2021;27:1230-1238. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01378-7. Acesso em: 09 mar. 2023.

2- Malta DC, et al. Social distancing, feelings of sadness and lifestyles of the Brazilian population during the Covid-19 pandemic. Health in Debate. 2020;44(spe4):177–190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-11042020E411.

3- Donizzetti AR, Lagacé M. COVID-19 and Mental Illness in the Elderly: The Role of Risk Perception, Social Isolation, Loneliness and Ageism. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:4513. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19084513.

4- Nikolich-Zugich J, Knox KS, Rios CT, et al. SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 in the elderly: what we can expect regarding pathogenesis, immune responses and outcomes. GeroScience. 2020;42:505–514. DOI: 10.1007/s11357-020-00186-0.

5- Manso M, et al. Ageismo e COVID-19: uma revisão integrativa. Invest Soc Desenv. 2021;10(11):e274101119233. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i11.19233. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19233. Acesso em: 6 jul. 2023.

6- Pan American Health Organization. World Report on Ageism. Washington, D.C. License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. 2022. DOI: 10.37774/9789275724453. Acesso em: 20 maio 2023.

7- Minó NM, Mello RMADV. Representation of old age: reflections on stereotypes, prejudice and stigmatization of the elderly. Oikos. 2021;32(1):273-298. DOI: 10.31423/oikos.v32i1.9889. Acesso em: 20 jun. 2023.

8- Minayo MC de, Costa AP. Theoretical Foundations of Qualitative Research Techniques. Rev. Lusófona de Educação. 2018;40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24140/issn.1645-7250.rle40.01.

9- Palmore E. The Ageism Survey: First Findings. Gerontologist. 2001;41(5):572–575. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/41.5.572.

10- Ferreira-Alves J, Novo RF. Assessment of social discrimination against elderly people in Portugal. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2006;6:65-77.

11- Couto MC de P, et al. Assessment of discrimination against the elderly in the Brazilian context - ageism. Psychol Theory Res. 2009;25(4):509-518.

12- Vilela RB, Ribeiro A, Batista NA. Word cloud as a content analysis tool: An application to the challenges of the professional master's degree in health education. Millenium. 2017;2(11):29-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29352/mill0211.03.00230.

13- Ayalon L, Cohn-Schwartz E. Measures of self-and other-directed ageism and worries concerning COVID-19 health consequences: Results from a nationally representative sample of Israelis over the age of 50. PLoS One. 2021;16(5):e0251577. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251577.

14- Fernández-Ballesteros R, Sánchez-Izquierdo M. Health, psychosocial factors and ageism in older people in Spain during the COVID-19 pandemic. Health. 2021;9(3):256. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9030256.

15- D'cruz M, Banerjee D. An invisible human rights crisis’: The marginalization of older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic – An advocacy review. Psychiatry Res. 2020;292:113369.

16- Rueda J. Ageism in the COVID-19 pandemic: Age-based discrimination in screening decisions and beyond. HPLS. 2021;43:91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-021-00441-3.

17- Abrahão Faiad De Moura A, Rezende Freitas E. Agerism In Urban Public Transport: A Reality? Interdiscip Stud Aging. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22456/2316-2171.132273.

18- Azambuja Rm Da M, Ramos Mn, Ramos Mcp. Grandparents and Cultures: Intergenerational relationships and experiences in times of the COVID-19 pandemic. Res Soc Dev. 2023;12(3):e27312340631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v12i3.40631.

19- Soares TS, Corradi-Perini C, Macedo CPL De, Ribeiro URVC. Covid-19 and ageism: ethical assessment of the distribution of health resources. Bioethics. 2021;29(2):242–250. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-80422021292461

20- Martinelli M, Rueda FJM. The influence of subjective well-being on quality of life in the elderly. Psicol Am Lat. 2020;34:183-193.

Descargas

Publicado

2025-05-15

Cómo citar

Santoro, M. B., Azzolin, V. F., Pitombo, A. de A. S., Brito, K. M. dos S. M., Mastella, M. H., Ribeiro, E. E., & da Cruz , I. B. M. (2025). A self-perception of ageism among elderly individuals during the covid-19 pandemic. Revista Contexto & Saúde, 25(50), e15784. https://doi.org/10.21527/2176-7114.2025.50.15784

Número

Vol. 25 Núm. 50 (2025): 2025

Sección

Artigo Original

Licencia

Derechos de autor 2025 Revista Contexto & Saúde

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.

Autores que publicam na Revista Contexto & Saúde concordam com os seguintes termos:

a) A submissão de trabalho(s) científico(s) original(is) pelos autores, na qualidade de titulares do direito de autor do(s) texto(s) enviado(s) ao periódico, nos termos da Lei 9.610/98, implica na cessão de direitos autorais de publicação na Revista Contexto e Saúde do(s) artigo(s) aceitos para publicação à Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, autorizando-se, ainda, que o(s) trabalho(s) científico(s) aprovado(s) seja(m) divulgado(s) gratuitamente, sem qualquer tipo de ressarcimento a título de direitos autorais, por meio do site da revista e suas bases de dados de indexação e repositórios, para fins de leitura, impressão e/ou download do arquivo do texto, a partir da data de aceitação para fins de publicação. Isto significa que, ao procederem a submissão do(s) artigo(s) à Revista Contexto e Saúde e, por conseguinte, a cessão gratuita dos direitos autorais relacionados ao trabalho científico enviado, os autores têm plena ciência de que não serão remunerados pela publicação do(s) artigo(s) no periódico.

b). Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.

c). Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.

d). Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).